Almost all unsatisfied comments and questions were under the client's promo videos and in private messages, and not in public access. This added job to SMM specialists.
Since people did not know about the security police, initially most of the comments were negative. So we quickly decided to work with the negative to the maximum and not leave it without answers.
More than 75% of the moderation work was devoted to explaining how the security police differ from the national police. After some time, while we were not sending personalized, but more general answers, it seemed to users that chatbots were answering in direct, so there is no point in writing in PM.
Then we changed our approach and began to answer more simply: to give more detailed explanations, to speak as personalized and with humor as possible.
All answers were agreed with the client. Both in the publications and in the comments, it was regularly said that the national police and the security police have different funding, functions and limits of responsibility, and that is why the security police do not come to the call for free.
What worked well in dealing with user negativity and fears:
– simple and extensive explanations,
– “live” tone of communication,
– maximum personalization of answers.
From that moment on, our SMMs began to address everyone by name, to show that we are not answering from a table of ready-made answers, but reacting directly to the request.
Work with moderation made it possible to reduce the degree of negativity towards the brand. We finally convinced the client not to delete dissatisfied comments, but to work with them.
Over time, brand advocates appeared on the Safor pages, explaining to users why they have to pay for calling the security police and that this is a separate unit from the national police.